Will Vietnam extend 50-year ownership rule?

Authored by the expert who managed and guided the team behind the Vietnam Property Pack

Everything you need to know before buying real estate is included in our Vietnam Property Pack

Who is the author of this content?

BAMBOOROUTES

A team specialized in real estate investing in APAC countries (Japan, Thailand, Indonesia, Australia, etc.).

We are a team of financial experts, legal professionals, developers, and local real estate specialists dedicated to helping people like you avoid mistakes when investing in real estate in a foreign place, particularly in Vietnam. If you'd like to learn more about us, you can check our presentation page.

What is the current 50-year ownership rule in Vietnam?

Vietnam restricts foreign property ownership to a maximum lease term of 50 years from the date of property certificate issuance.

Foreign investors can own apartments and houses through leasehold arrangements, with the possibility to extend for another 50 years upon government approval. This system applies to all residential properties purchased by non-Vietnamese citizens.

The rule limits foreign ownership to designated developments and imposes caps on the percentage of units foreigners can own within each project. Foreigners cannot own land outright but can hold use rights through the leasehold system.

As of September 2025, renewal procedures remain subject to government discretion, creating uncertainty for long-term investment planning.

Why was the 50-year ownership rule introduced originally?

The Vietnamese government implemented the 50-year rule to maintain control over foreign property ownership while facilitating urban development and protecting local housing accessibility.

Primary reasons included enabling smoother redevelopment of aging buildings, maintaining structural safety standards, and preventing excessive property speculation that could price out Vietnamese citizens. The limited tenure system allows authorities to upgrade or demolish unsafe buildings more efficiently.

The rule also aims to balance foreign investment benefits with local housing needs, ensuring Vietnamese citizens retain priority access to residential properties in key urban areas.

Additionally, the time-limited ownership helps stabilize property prices and prevents long-term asset accumulation by foreign investors that could distort the local market.

How does this rule impact foreign investors in Vietnam?

Foreign investors face significant limitations under the current leasehold system compared to freehold ownership available in some other markets.

The 50-year restriction creates uncertainty about long-term investment security, as renewal approval is not guaranteed. This affects inheritance planning, resale options, and the ability to use property as reliable collateral for financing.

Leasehold properties typically trade at lower prices than freehold equivalents, which appeals to yield-focused investors but deters those seeking legacy assets. Foreign investors must also navigate complex regulations about which developments allow foreign ownership and face caps on the percentage they can own within each project.

The uncertainty around renewal procedures makes financial planning challenging, particularly for investors considering Vietnam properties as retirement assets or long-term wealth preservation vehicles.

What changes are being proposed to the current ownership rule?

The Vietnamese government is actively considering extending the maximum foreign ownership term from 50 to 70 years, particularly in financial centers and new development projects.

Why is there ongoing debate around extending or revising this rule?

The debate centers on balancing foreign investment attraction with protection of local housing interests and long-term urban planning goals.

Supporters of extension argue that longer terms will enhance Vietnam's competitiveness as an investment destination, attract more foreign capital, and create a more liquid real estate market. They contend that current restrictions limit Vietnam's ability to compete with neighboring countries for foreign investment.

Opponents worry that extended foreign ownership could fuel property speculation, drive up prices beyond local affordability, and reduce Vietnamese citizens' access to housing in prime locations. Many residents view permanent property ownership as fundamental to household wealth building and intergenerational asset transfer.

The government must weigh economic benefits against social stability concerns and ensure any changes align with broader urban development and housing policy objectives.

It's something we develop in our Vietnam property pack.

Don't lose money on your property in Vietnam

100% of people who have lost money there have spent less than 1 hour researching the market. We have reviewed everything there is to know. Grab our guide now.

Download Now

How would extending the ownership rule benefit or harm foreign investors?

Extension to 70 years would significantly enhance investment security and financial planning capabilities for foreign property buyers in Vietnam.

Benefits for foreign investors:

1. Increased property values due to longer security of tenure
2. Enhanced ability to use property as collateral for financing
3. Better inheritance and estate planning options
4. More attractive resale market with longer remaining lease terms
5. Greater confidence for retirement planning and long-term residence

Potential drawbacks:

1. Higher initial purchase prices as sellers capitalize on extended terms
2. Increased competition from other foreign investors
3. Possible introduction of additional taxes or fees on longer leases
4. Risk of policy reversal affecting existing agreements
5. Potential restrictions on certain property types or locations

The net effect would likely be positive for serious long-term investors but could price out short-term or budget-conscious buyers.

What are the potential economic risks to Vietnam if the rule changes?

Extending foreign ownership terms could create both opportunities and significant economic risks for Vietnam's property market and broader economy.

Major risks include property market volatility if foreign investors dominate certain segments and subsequently exit en masse during economic downturns or policy changes. This could destabilize local property values and create boom-bust cycles.

Extended foreign ownership might fuel property price bubbles in desirable areas, making housing unaffordable for Vietnamese citizens and worsening wealth inequality. This could lead to social tensions and political pressure for policy reversals.

The concentration of foreign ownership in prime locations could limit Vietnamese citizens' access to quality housing and commercial spaces, potentially affecting local business development and social cohesion.

Additionally, excessive liberalization might complicate future urban redevelopment projects, as dealing with numerous foreign property owners could slow necessary infrastructure upgrades and city planning initiatives.

What do experts say about the long-term impact of extending the ownership rule?

Real estate experts remain divided on the long-term implications of extending Vietnam's foreign ownership terms, with arguments on both sides supported by regional market evidence.

Proponents argue that extended terms would significantly improve Vietnam's competitiveness as an investment destination, diversify the property market, and create more liquid real estate assets that benefit both foreign and domestic investors. They point to successful models in other Southeast Asian countries where longer foreign ownership terms have attracted substantial investment without displacing local buyers.

Skeptics warn that over-extension could undermine local interests, create market uncertainty at renewal points, and complicate essential urban renewal projects. They emphasize that Vietnam's rapid urbanization requires flexible property policies that don't lock in current development patterns for excessive periods.

Most experts agree that successful implementation requires careful regulation, transparent renewal procedures, and mechanisms to balance foreign investment benefits with local housing accessibility and urban planning needs.

We did some research and made this infographic to help you quickly compare rental yields of the major cities in Vietnam versus those in neighboring countries. It provides a clear view of how this country positions itself as a real estate investment destination, which might interest you if you're planning to invest there.

How have other countries handled similar ownership rules for foreign investors?

Regional comparison reveals diverse approaches to foreign property ownership, with Vietnam's current system falling in the middle range of restrictions among Southeast Asian nations.

Countries with more liberal policies like Malaysia and Singapore have attracted significant foreign investment but also experienced rapid price appreciation that has raised affordability concerns for local residents.

What is the current stance of the Vietnamese government on this matter?

As of September 2025, the Vietnamese government is taking a cautious but progressive approach toward extending foreign property ownership terms, particularly focusing on priority development areas and financial centers.

Government officials have indicated that gradual extension and clarification of ownership rules are under consideration, with draft decrees suggesting longer terms may become standard in new developments. However, core principles of state land management and social housing protection remain unchanged.

The Ministry of Construction and related agencies are reviewing proposals that would extend ownership terms to 70 years while maintaining caps on foreign ownership percentages within developments. Priority areas for implementation include financial centers, special economic zones, and major urban development projects.

The government emphasizes that any changes will be implemented gradually with careful monitoring of market impacts and social effects, indicating a measured approach rather than sweeping immediate reforms.

What are the views of local businesses and citizens regarding the extension?

Vietnamese public opinion on extending foreign ownership terms reflects deep concerns about housing accessibility and property as family wealth, while business views vary significantly by sector.

Many Vietnamese citizens fear losing permanent ownership rights and view apartments and houses as crucial family assets for intergenerational wealth transfer. Surveys indicate strong preference for maintaining perpetual ownership rights rather than adopting leasehold systems, even for Vietnamese buyers.

Local businesses show mixed perspectives: property developers generally favor leasehold diversification as it could attract more foreign investment and increase project values, while traditional Vietnamese buyers and some real estate agents prefer the security of permanent holdings.

Urban middle-class families particularly worry that extended foreign ownership terms could accelerate property price increases in desirable neighborhoods, making homeownership less attainable for Vietnamese professionals and young families.

Business associations have called for balanced policies that attract foreign investment while preserving Vietnamese priority access to residential properties in key urban areas.

It's something we develop in our Vietnam property pack.

How will changes to the rule affect Vietnam's real estate and property market?

Extending foreign ownership terms to 70 years would likely trigger significant changes across Vietnam's residential property market, with effects varying by location and property type.

The Ho Chi Minh City and Hanoi condo markets would probably experience increased foreign investment flows, potentially driving up prices in prime districts where foreign ownership is concentrated. New development projects in these cities might see higher foreign participation rates and faster sales cycles.

Property liquidity would improve as longer lease terms make resale more attractive to subsequent buyers, creating more active secondary markets for foreign-owned properties. Enhanced financing options through expanded collateral rights could increase leverage and transaction volumes.

However, rapid price escalation risks creating affordability challenges for Vietnamese buyers in popular areas, potentially leading to market segmentation between foreign-accessible and local-focused developments.

Regional markets in cities like Da Nang, Nha Trang, and emerging destinations could see accelerated foreign investment, particularly in lifestyle and retirement-focused properties, reshaping local market dynamics.

The overall market effect will depend heavily on implementation details, including which areas receive priority for extended terms and whether ownership caps are adjusted alongside tenure extensions.

It's something we develop in our Vietnam property pack.

Conclusion

This article is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Readers are advised to consult with a qualified professional before making any investment decisions. We do not assume any liability for actions taken based on the information provided.

Sources

1. AN Law Vietnam - Foreigners Buy Houses
2. Vietnam Briefing - Housing Law Draft Decree
3. Vietnam Law Magazine - Limited Term Apartment Ownership
4. SGGP - Limited Period Ownership Under Debate
5. BambooRoutes - Vietnam Foreign Property Ownership
6. HMLF - Foreigners Guide to Property Ownership Laws
7. InvestAsian - Property Investment Risks Vietnam
8. The Investor - 50-70 Year Ownership Certificates
9. VietnamNet - New Real Estate Policies for Foreigners
10. The Nation - ASEAN Property Ownership