Get all the data you need about the real estate market in Thailand
SUMMARY
Foreigners will probably not be able to own 75% of Thai condos soon. Thailand genuinely considered raising the foreign ownership ceiling from 49% to 75%, but the proposal has not become law and still lacks the legislative progress we would expect from an imminent reform.
The current rule remains straightforward: foreigners can own up to 49% of the total unit area in a registered condominium. The much-publicized 75% figure came from a government study launched in 2024, not from an enacted amendment.
The existing quota is also much less restrictive nationally than the headlines suggest. Foreigners accounted for only 14.7% of condo transfers by unit in 2025, so Thailand does not have a broad market where overseas buyers are routinely running into the 49% ceiling.
The real quota problem is concentrated in a small number of projects. Bangkok, Chonburi and Phuket account for the overwhelming majority of foreign condo demand, and individual internationally marketed buildings can reach the limit even while most Thai condominiums remain well below it.
That concentration weakens the case for a blanket 75% rule. A targeted increase in certain locations or qualifying projects would address the buildings that actually have a quota problem without opening every condominium nationwide to 75% foreign ownership.
Foreign demand itself has recently cooled. Foreign condo transfers fell 17.3% year on year in the first quarter of 2026, while Chinese purchases fell much faster, reducing the immediate economic pressure for a large nationwide liberalization.
A higher quota would help some developers, but it would not rescue Thailand's wider housing market. Projects already close to 49% could unlock additional foreign demand; developments struggling because Thai buyers cannot obtain mortgages would see little change.
The political backdrop has also become less favorable. Thailand is simultaneously intensifying investigations into nominee shareholders, foreign-controlled property structures and illegal accommodation businesses, making a sweeping expansion of foreign property ownership harder to sell politically.
If a 75% rule ever arrived, it would not mean foreigners suddenly gained unrestricted control over condo buildings. The original policy discussion contemplated keeping foreign voting influence around the existing level even if economic ownership rose above 49%, although no final legal mechanism has been drafted.
Foreign buyers therefore should not plan purchases around the proposed reform. Unless a specific building has already exhausted its foreign freehold quota, the difference between 49% and 75% changes very little for an individual buyer today.
The more plausible long-term outcome is some form of narrower liberalization rather than the original nationwide proposal. Until actual amendment language reaches the legislative process, 49% is the law and 75% remains a policy idea that may never arrive in its original form.
Thinking of buying real estate in Thailand?
Acquiring property in a different country is a complex task. Don't fall into common traps – grab our guide and make better decisions.
Can foreigners own 75% of a Thai condo building today?
No. Foreigners are currently still limited to 49% of the total unit area in a registered Thai condominium, and the proposed 75% ceiling has never become law.
The 75% figure comes from a real government initiative, which is why the story keeps resurfacing. In 2024, the Thai government asked the Ministry of Interior to study increasing the foreign ownership quota from 49% to 75%, alongside proposals for much longer property leases.
But the proposal never made the leap from policy discussion to law. Current Department of Lands guidance continues to apply the 49% ceiling under the Condominium Act. A recent legal review reached the same conclusion: no 75% bill has been passed, no new quota is in force, and the existing rule remains unchanged.
That gap between the headline and the actual law is the important part for foreign buyers. Thailand genuinely considered 75%, but there is currently no legal basis for buying above 49%.
| Issue | Rule currently in force | Proposal discussed | Position today |
|---|---|---|---|
| Foreign condo ownership | 49% of total unit area | Up to 75% | Not enacted |
| Foreign voting influence | Governed by current Condominium Act rules | Additional safeguards discussed | No new system |
| Standard property leases | Generally up to 30 years | Much longer periods discussed | No general reform |
| Foreign ownership of ordinary Thai land | Generally prohibited except narrow exceptions | No general opening proposed | Unchanged |
Why did Thailand even consider raising the foreign condo quota to 75%?
Thailand considered a 75% foreign condo quota because some developers wanted access to more overseas buyers while domestic housing demand was weak.
The idea appeared during a difficult period for Thai residential property. Household debt was high, mortgage rejection rates were hurting local demand, developers were carrying unsold stock, and foreign buyers were already an important source of cash purchases.
Condos were the obvious place to experiment because Thailand already allows foreigners to own qualifying condominium units outright. Increasing an existing condo quota is politically easier than opening ordinary Thai land to unrestricted foreign ownership.
There was also a very practical developer problem behind the proposal. A condominium can still have unsold apartments after its foreign quota is full. If another overseas buyer wants freehold ownership, the developer cannot simply sell that unit to the buyer as foreign freehold once the building has reached 49%.
Raising the ceiling would give those projects another 26 percentage points of potential foreign sales.
That sounds significant, but it only helps when foreign demand is already strong enough to reach the current ceiling. Across most of Thailand, that condition does not exist.
Don't buy the wrong property, in the wrong area of Thailand
Buying real estate is a significant investment. Don't rely solely on your intuition. Gather the right information to make the best decision.
Are foreign buyers anywhere close to filling Thailand's 49% condo quota?
No. Foreign buyers currently account for only a fraction of Thai condo transactions nationwide, so Thailand is nowhere near a national 49% foreign-ownership problem.
REIC recorded 3,241 foreign condominium transfers in the first quarter of 2026. Foreigners represented 13.6% of all condo transfers by unit and 23.9% by value.
The comparison is not mathematically identical to the legal quota. The 49% rule measures accumulated foreign-owned floor area inside each individual condominium, while REIC records transactions during a particular period.
Even with that distinction, the scale tells us a lot. A nationwide market where roughly one in seven transferred condos goes to a foreign buyer is very different from one where foreign ownership is routinely hitting the statutory ceiling.
Research from CBRE around the original proposal reached a similar conclusion at project level. Among the Bangkok developments it examined, only a tiny number were approaching the 49% limit, while most remained below 40%.
So a higher quota would solve a real problem for certain buildings, but calling the existing 49% ceiling a nationwide constraint overstates the issue.
| Period | Foreign condo transfers | Foreign share by unit | Foreign transfer value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | About 14,450 | 13.4% | About ฿73bn |
| 2024 | 14,573 | 12.5% | ฿68.18bn |
| 2025 | 14,899 | 14.7% | ฿60.92bn |
| Q1 2026 | 3,241 | 13.6% | ฿13.46bn |
Where would a 75% foreign condo quota actually make a difference?
A 75% foreign condo quota would matter mainly in Bangkok, Pattaya and Phuket rather than across Thailand as a whole.
Foreign demand is extremely concentrated. In 2025, Bangkok recorded 7,029 foreign condominium transfers, Chonburi 4,164 and Phuket 1,190. Together, those three provinces accounted for more than four-fifths of all foreign condo transfers nationwide.
The pattern remained obvious recently. Chonburi alone recorded 1,167 foreign transfers in the first quarter of 2026, while Bangkok accounted for 45.6% of the value of all foreign condo transfers.
That concentration explains why the current 49% ceiling can genuinely frustrate buyers in one Pattaya or central Bangkok development while being completely irrelevant to hundreds of other projects.
A suburban condo aimed mainly at Thai households might have little foreign ownership at all. A resort project marketed heavily in Russia, China or Europe can face an entirely different buyer mix.
This is why a blanket national jump to 75% looks much harder to justify than some form of targeted liberalization.
| Market | 2025 foreign transfers | Approx. share of national foreign transfers | Why foreign demand is unusually strong |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bangkok | 7,029 | 47% | Jobs, investment demand and premium projects |
| Chonburi | 4,164 | 28% | Pattaya's deep international buyer base |
| Phuket | 1,190 | 8% | Second homes, tourism and long-stay demand |
| Chiang Mai | 848 | 6% | Retirement and long-stay buyers |
| Rest of Thailand | About 1,668 | 11% | Foreign demand is far more fragmented |
Get to know the market before buying a property in Thailand
Better information leads to better decisions. Get all the data you need before investing a large amount of money.
Would foreigners control Thai condo buildings if the quota rose to 75%?
Probably not under the version Thailand originally discussed, because policymakers wanted to allow more foreign ownership while stopping foreigners from gaining majority voting power.
When the 75% proposal was promoted, the government floated a system under which foreign ownership could exceed 49% while foreign voting rights remained capped around the existing level.
In practical terms, a building could therefore become mostly foreign-owned economically while Thai owners still retained majority voting power in the condominium juristic person.
That compromise would make the policy easier to defend politically, but it creates some awkward questions.
Condo owners vote on building budgets, major repairs, common-property expenses, management and other decisions that directly affect their property. Someone owning an apartment worth several million baht would naturally care whether ownership rights and voting rights remain aligned.
No final statutory language has answered those questions because the reform has never reached that stage.
For now, the proposed voting safeguard shows what policymakers were trying to achieve, but it should not be treated as a finished rule.
Are Chinese buyers still driving the push for a 75% Thai condo quota?
Chinese buyers still lead the Thai foreign condo market, but their recent decline makes the case for an urgent 75% quota weaker than it once looked.
Chinese nationals bought 4,940 Thai condominium units in 2025, roughly one-third of all foreign transfers. Yet their number of purchases fell 12.9%, while the value of those transactions dropped about 30% to ฿18.6 billion.
The slowdown became much sharper in the first quarter of 2026. Chinese buyers transferred 906 units, down 38.8% from a year earlier, and the value of their purchases fell 42.9%.
Other nationalities are filling some of the gap. Russians have become increasingly important, particularly in resort markets. Myanmar buyers have also become one of the largest foreign groups, while Indian buyers stand out for purchasing relatively large and expensive units.
Thailand's foreign condo demand now comes from a much broader mix than the China-led boom of earlier years.
That reduces the urgency behind a nationwide quota increase. Developers still want more access to overseas buyers, but current data hardly show foreigners queuing nationwide because the 49% ceiling has become too restrictive.
Buying real estate in Thailand can be risky
An increasing number of foreign investors are showing interest. However, 90% of them will make mistakes. Avoid the pitfalls with our comprehensive guide.
Would a 75% foreign quota revive Thailand's weak condo market?
Only at the margin. Raising the foreign condo quota could help some projects sell more units, but it would not fix the deeper problems holding back Thailand's housing market.
The clearest warning comes from recent foreign sales themselves. REIC recorded a 17.3% year-on-year drop in foreign condo transfers in the first quarter of 2026, while transaction value fell 17.9%.
Domestic developers are dealing with their own problems at the same time. Buyers face affordability constraints, Thai mortgage approvals remain difficult for many households, and developers have responded by cutting launches rather than flooding the market with new projects.
Now imagine two different buildings.
A Pattaya development sitting close to its 49% foreign limit and receiving more enquiries from overseas buyers could benefit immediately from a higher quota.
A suburban Bangkok project with weak Thai sales and only 10% foreign ownership would gain almost nothing because the problem is demand, rather than the legal ceiling.
A 75% quota could therefore improve liquidity in a small part of the condo market. Describing it as a rescue plan for Thai property would give the measure far too much credit.
Would Thai condo buyers suddenly have to compete with foreigners?
Across Thailand, no. In a few foreign-heavy projects, a 75% quota could noticeably increase competition between Thai and overseas buyers.
Foreigners represented 14.7% of condo transfers by unit in 2025. That is far too small a share for foreign demand to suddenly dominate the national market simply because the legal ceiling rises.
The local picture can be completely different. Foreign purchases are heavily concentrated in central Bangkok, Pattaya, Phuket and internationally marketed developments. If a popular building were allowed to move from 49% to 75% foreign ownership, another quarter of its floor area could effectively become available to overseas buyers.
That could push prices higher where foreigners have stronger purchasing power or are less dependent on Thai mortgages.
The effect would also vary sharply by price segment. Foreign demand for a ฿15 million Bangkok apartment has little direct impact on a Thai family looking for a ฿2 million suburban condo. The overlap becomes much more meaningful in investment-oriented and resort projects.
The fear that foreigners would take over Thailand's entire condo market is exaggerated. Buyers in a handful of locations would have much more reason to pay attention.
Don't lose money on your property in Thailand
100% of people who have lost money there have spent less than 1 hour researching the market. We have reviewed everything there is to know. Grab our guide now.
Could a 75% foreign quota actually push Thai condo prices up?
Yes, but any meaningful price increase would probably be concentrated in buildings that already attract large numbers of foreign buyers.
Consider a condominium that has reached 49% foreign ownership while overseas buyers are still prepared to purchase more units. The developer currently loses access to those buyers once the quota is full. Moving the ceiling to 75% suddenly opens another 26% of the building to that demand.
That gives the seller more bargaining power and can support higher prices.
The problem with extrapolating that effect to Thailand as a whole is that most projects never reach the first ceiling. CBRE found very few Bangkok developments close to 49% when the reform was originally debated.
Foreign transaction value has also been cooling. It fell from roughly ฿68.2 billion in 2024 to ฿60.9 billion in 2025 before dropping again year on year in early 2026.
We would therefore expect a noticeable effect in some central Bangkok and resort projects, while much of the broader condo market would barely feel the change.
Could 75% foreign ownership turn Thai condos into mostly foreign communities?
Yes. A building could become overwhelmingly foreign-owned under a 75% quota even if Thai owners kept majority voting power.
That is one of the more legitimate concerns around the proposal because ownership affects how a building functions in ways that go well beyond voting.
A resort condominium with large numbers of overseas investors can have more absentee owners, higher tenant turnover and more pressure to generate rental income. Buildings primarily occupied by local owner-residents tend to behave differently.
Short-term rentals make the issue more sensitive. Thai hotel operators have repeatedly worried about condo units competing with licensed hotels when owners rent them out illegally by the night.
Authorities are currently taking that problem seriously. Recent enforcement in Phuket has included inspections of suspected unlicensed accommodation businesses, while officials have ordered further checks of hundreds of companies linked to foreign investors.
A higher ownership quota would not legalize Airbnb-style rentals where they are otherwise prohibited. But allowing buildings to become much more foreign-investor-heavy without improving enforcement could make the tension worse.
Get the full checklist for your due diligence in Thailand
Don't repeat the same mistakes others have made before you. Make sure everything is in order before signing your sales contract.
Does Thailand's current nominee crackdown make a 75% condo quota harder to pass?
Yes. Thailand's current political climate makes a sweeping expansion of foreign property ownership harder to sell than it looked when the 75% proposal first appeared.
The government has recently turned foreign nominee ownership into a high-profile enforcement issue.
The Ministry of Interior has ordered stronger checks on land transactions and suspicious Thai shareholders acting on behalf of foreigners. The government has also created broader mechanisms for agencies to investigate foreign-controlled businesses and property structures.
Enforcement has moved well beyond speeches. Authorities recently froze more than 126 rai of land in Krabi worth roughly ฿2.15 billion in an investigation involving suspected foreign nominee ownership. Similar operations have targeted Phuket, Phang Nga and Pattaya.
The Pattaya operation is particularly relevant because Chonburi is currently Thailand's biggest foreign condo market by number of transactions.
None of these measures prevents the government from making legal foreign condo purchases easier. There is even an argument that clearer legal routes could reduce demand for questionable structures.
Still, the politics have clearly changed. A government publicly promising to protect Thai land and crack down on foreign control would need a very convincing explanation before allowing almost three-quarters of every condominium building in the country to be foreign-owned.
| Recent government action | What it tells us |
|---|---|
| Stronger Land Department checks | Foreign-linked property ownership is under closer scrutiny |
| National push against nominee structures | Enforcement has become a government priority |
| Krabi land worth about ฿2.15bn frozen | The crackdown is producing large real cases |
| Operations in Pattaya and Phuket | Enforcement is reaching the main foreign property markets |
| 75% condo proposal still not enacted | Liberalization has clearly lost its earlier momentum |
Why is Thailand's 75% condo proposal still stuck after more than two years?
The long delay is becoming evidence in itself: Thailand has never turned the 75% foreign condo idea into a serious legislative push.
When the proposal emerged in 2024, the Ministry of Interior was asked to study it. Officials quickly stressed that safeguards would be needed, particularly around voting rights and the effect on Thai ownership.
The study phase then dragged on.
By 2025, senior officials were still describing the 75% proposal as something under consideration rather than presenting a finished amendment. Today, the Department of Lands continues to apply exactly the same 49% rule.
There is an even stronger clue now. A recent legal review of the proposal found that no bill raising the quota to 75% had been tabled in Parliament.
That does not make revival impossible. Thai property groups continue to lobby for measures that attract overseas money, especially while developers are struggling with domestic demand.
But after more than two years without an actual bill, calling the change “imminent” becomes very difficult to defend.
Don't sign a document you don't understand in Thailand
Buying a property over there? We have reviewed all the documents you need to know. Stay out of trouble - grab our comprehensive guide.
Could Thailand raise the foreign condo quota without going all the way to 75%?
Yes, and a targeted increase now looks more realistic than letting every condominium in Thailand become 75% foreign-owned.
The data almost point toward that compromise by themselves.
Bangkok, Chonburi and Phuket dominate overseas condo demand. Most of the rest of Thailand does not have a foreign-quota problem at all.
Thailand could therefore allow higher foreign ownership only in designated locations, developments above a certain price, projects with large amounts of unsold inventory or buildings meeting other conditions.
Property-industry groups have floated variations of this idea before. Some have also argued for longer leases or other structures rather than relying entirely on freehold ownership.
A targeted model would be much easier to defend politically. It could help resort and investment markets without applying the same rule to affordable housing developments aimed at Thai households.
If the 49% ceiling eventually changes, we think this kind of limited reform has a better chance than the original blanket 75% idea.
Would a 75% condo quota make buying property in Thailand dramatically easier for foreigners?
Only for foreigners who are currently blocked by a building's quota. The other major restrictions around buying Thai property would remain.
A foreigner already buying in a condominium with plenty of available foreign quota gains almost nothing from moving the building ceiling from 49% to 75%. The buyer can already obtain foreign freehold ownership under the current rules, assuming the legal and foreign-exchange requirements are met.
Foreign buyers would still need to handle the documentation required for qualifying funds transferred from abroad. Thai mortgage financing would remain much harder to obtain for many foreigners than for Thai borrowers.
The reform would also leave Thailand's land rules largely untouched. Foreign individuals generally cannot own ordinary Thai land directly except through narrow legal exceptions.
So the practical benefit is quite specific. Someone trying to buy foreign freehold in a Phuket, Pattaya or Bangkok project where the foreign quota has already filled could suddenly gain access to units that are currently unavailable.
For most other buyers, the buying process would look much the same.
Get fresh and reliable information about the market in Thailand
Don't base significant investment decisions on outdated data. Get updated and accurate information.
What needs to happen before Thailand can actually raise the foreign condo quota to 75%?
Thailand needs a real amendment to the Condominium Act before foreigners can own anything above the current 49% ceiling.
The next meaningful development would therefore be legal text.
We would want to see a draft amendment clearly specifying the new quota, any restrictions by location or property type, how voting rights would work and when the change would take effect.
That proposal would then have to progress through the legislative process and be formally enacted before the Department of Lands could start registering ownership above 49%.
Government discussions, developer lobbying and statements that officials are “studying” the idea do not cross that threshold.
As of now, the proposal has not reached the milestones that would make us treat a 75% quota as close.
| Stage | Status | What it would mean |
|---|---|---|
| Government asks officials to study 75% quota | Completed | The policy became a real government idea |
| Ministry examines possible safeguards | Completed | Early policy work |
| Concrete amendment reaches Parliament | Not currently established | First strong sign the proposal is serious again |
| Parliament passes the change | No | Legal approval |
| New rules take effect | No | 75% becomes usable in practice |
Should foreign buyers wait for Thailand's 75% condo quota before buying?
No, unless the specific condo you want has already run out of foreign freehold quota.
Foreign buyers should currently make purchase decisions using 49% as the real legal ceiling. There is too little legislative momentum behind 75% to plan a transaction around it.
If a building still has foreign quota available, waiting gives the buyer very little. The current system already allows qualifying foreigners to own a condo unit freehold.
The calculation changes when someone wants a unit in a project where foreign ownership is already at or near 49%. A future increase could reopen access to foreign freehold units in that building.
Even then, the timing is impossible to rely on. The proposal has remained unresolved for years while the political environment around foreign property ownership has recently become more restrictive.
A sales agent describing the 75% quota as something buyers can essentially count on today is getting ahead of the law.
Get to know the market before buying a property in Thailand
Better information leads to better decisions. Get all the data you need before investing a large amount of money.
So, will foreigners soon be able to own 75% of Thai condos?
Probably not. Thailand really did consider raising the foreign condo ownership ceiling to 75%, but the proposal currently looks much closer to a stalled policy idea than an approaching change in the law.
The strongest evidence is the lack of legislative movement. More than two years after the government launched the study, foreigners remain limited to 49%, no 75% amendment is in force and recent legal reviews still find no bill advancing the change through Parliament.
The market has also moved in the wrong direction for anyone arguing that Thailand urgently needs a much larger quota. Foreign condo transfers fell 17.3% year on year in the first quarter of 2026. Chinese purchases, once the obvious engine behind calls for more foreign capacity, fell even faster.
Meanwhile, the political mood has hardened. The government is currently pursuing nominee networks, investigating foreign-linked property structures and seizing land in major foreign-investment areas. As seen above, some of the most visible operations are happening in the same resort markets that would benefit most from a higher condo quota.
Thailand still has good reasons to make legitimate foreign property investment easier. Developers need buyers, foreign demand remains valuable, and the present 49% ceiling genuinely blocks transactions in some popular projects.
But the original proposal was extremely broad. Allowing foreign ownership to rise from 49% to 75% in every qualifying condominium nationwide would be a major policy shift to solve a problem concentrated in relatively few buildings.
Our judgment is fairly clear: a higher foreign condo quota could eventually return, and a targeted version would make economic sense. A nationwide 75% rule arriving soon looks premature.
Foreign buyers should continue treating 49% as the law and 75% as a proposal that may never arrive in its original form.
OUR METHODOLOGY
This analysis tests whether Thailand is genuinely moving toward allowing foreigners to own up to 75% of the unit area in condominium buildings. We separate the proposal itself from the law currently in force, then compare legislative progress with foreign-buyer activity, project-level quota pressure, geographic concentration, the condition of the housing market and the wider political environment around foreign property ownership.
For the legal position, we prioritize the Condominium Act and current Department of Lands guidance. These establish the existing 49% foreign-ownership ceiling and the registration requirements that still apply to foreign condominium buyers.
The original 75% proposal is treated as a genuine government initiative, but not as a legal change. Government Public Relations Department material from 2024 is used to establish that officials were asked to study increasing the quota from 49% to 75%, alongside longer lease terms and possible safeguards limiting foreign voting influence.
Legislative progress carries more weight in our conclusion than lobbying or policy discussion. For a change of this size to look genuinely close, we would expect concrete amendment language, parliamentary progress and a clear implementation framework. The continued application of the 49% rule is therefore a much stronger indicator than repeated reports that the proposal remains under consideration.
REIC data are used to measure the size, direction and geographic concentration of foreign condominium demand. We keep these figures separate from the legal quota because the two measure different things: the statutory limit concerns accumulated foreign-owned unit area inside an individual condominium, while REIC transfer data measure transactions completed over a period.
Project-level evidence is important because national averages can hide the buildings where the quota actually binds. CBRE's observations on Bangkok projects are used as a check on whether condominiums routinely approach the 49% ceiling, while REIC's Bangkok, Chonburi and Phuket figures show where foreign demand is concentrated.
Recent market direction is given more weight than older boom-period assumptions. The decline in foreign transfers in early 2026, the sharper fall in Chinese purchases, weaker domestic housing demand and reduced developer launches all help test whether there is currently strong economic pressure for an immediate nationwide quota increase.
We also use recent nominee, land and unlicensed-accommodation enforcement as political context rather than as direct evidence about condominium law. These actions do not prevent Thailand from liberalizing legitimate foreign condo ownership, but they help show how sensitive foreign-controlled property has become in the current policy environment.
Key sources used include the Department of Lands guidance for foreign condominium buyers, the Department of Lands-hosted Condominium Act, the Department of Lands regulation on foreign condominium ownership, the Thai Government Public Relations Department on the original 75% proposal, and the Thai Parliament record discussing the proposed amendment.
For market evidence, key sources include REIC's Q1 2026 foreign condominium transfer report, the REIC full-year 2025 foreign condominium report, REIC's geographic breakdown of foreign purchases, the REIC 2024 Annual Report, the REIC 2023 Annual Report, and Bangkok Post reporting of CBRE's project-level findings on the 49% ceiling.
The wider housing and enforcement context is checked against the REIC Bangkok Metropolitan Region housing-market report, the Bank of Thailand's 2026 housing-market and LTV consultation, Thai Government reporting on the nominee crackdown in Phuket, Krabi and Phang Nga, the Krabi nominee land investigation, Phuket foreign-business and hotel inspections, and Phuket government reporting on unlicensed-hotel enforcement.
The final judgment gives the most weight to enacted law and concrete legislative progress, then to evidence showing whether the existing quota is actually restrictive in practice. Market demand, geography and political enforcement are used to explain the pressure for or against reform, rather than being treated as substitutes for the legal process itself.
Buying real estate in Thailand can be risky
An increasing number of foreign investors are showing interest. However, 90% of them will make mistakes. Avoid the pitfalls with our comprehensive guide.
Related blog posts
- Is Thailand cracking down on foreign property owners?
- Are foreign-owned Thai companies still safe for property?
- Is buying a villa in Thailand riskier for foreigners now?
- Could Thailand force foreigners to sell their villas?
Fact-checked and reviewed by our local expert
Attaya Suriyawonghae 🇹🇭
Real Estate Broker, Zest Real Estate
