Get all the data you need about the real estate market in The Philippines
SUMMARY
How much it costs to retire comfortably in the Philippines cannot be established from this analysis, because the evidence supplied here is about Bandung property risk rather than Philippine retirement costs.
For Bandung property, the main conclusion is much clearer: the biggest risks are legal mistakes, highly local flood and subsidence exposure, weak resale liquidity, and paying too much for development stories that may take years to justify the price.
Bandung is unusually difficult to judge at city level. Two properties only a few kilometres apart can have completely different exposure to flooding, slope stability, traffic, tenant demand, resale competition and infrastructure benefits.
Price growth is not strong enough to rescue a bad entry price quickly. Indonesia’s latest primary-market data point to weak nominal appreciation, so overpaying by 10% can leave an investor underwater for years once transaction and holding costs are included.
Foreign ownership is workable when the legal structure is clean, but shortcuts are dangerous. The difference between Hak Pakai, qualifying apartment ownership, a long lease and a nominee arrangement is more important than almost any marketing claim attached to the property.
Cheap apartments deserve particular suspicion when hundreds of near-identical units compete for the same tenants and buyers. In that market, one distressed seller can reset expectations for an entire building, while weak maintenance can damage both rent and resale.
Bandung’s large tourism and student populations do not automatically create strong investment returns. High visitor counts can coexist with mediocre hotel occupancy, and students can often substitute cheaper kost rooms for investor-owned apartments.
Physical risk is concentrated rather than uniform. Flooding in the southern basin, subsidence in parts of the metropolitan area and earthquake vulnerability around the active Lembang Fault all argue for property-level due diligence rather than broad neighborhood assumptions.
Infrastructure can improve a location without making every nearby property a good investment. Whoosh connectivity is real, but last-mile travel, congestion and local physical risks can wipe out much of the practical advantage advertised in a sales brochure.
The safest Bandung purchases tend to look boring: clean title, independently checked documents, proven access in heavy rain, realistic peak-hour travel, evidence of actual secondary-market demand and a purchase price close to completed resale values rather than developer asking prices.
Thinking of buying real estate in the Philippines?
Acquiring property in a different country is a complex task. Don't fall into common traps – grab our guide and make better decisions.
Why can two Bandung properties a few kilometres apart have completely different risks?
Bandung property risk is unusually local, so choosing a good city or even a good district does not guarantee we are buying a good property.
A house in Dago, an apartment in Ciumbuleuit, a new development in Gedebage and a villa toward Lembang are exposed to very different problems. Flooding becomes much more important in parts of the basin. Hillside construction raises different engineering questions in the north. Apartments around universities depend heavily on rental competition and building management. Developments around Greater Bandung's newer transport links can carry a price premium for infrastructure whose benefit varies enormously from one site to another.
Even the word “Bandung” creates confusion. Kota Bandung, Bandung Regency, West Bandung, Cimahi and the wider Bandung Basin often get grouped together in listings and market reports. For a buyer, that is too broad to be useful.
We would judge Bandung property almost street by street. The city can make sense while a particular building, parcel or access road still makes very little sense.
| Type of Bandung property | What attracts buyers | Risk we would worry about first | First thing to check |
|---|---|---|---|
| North Bandung apartment | Universities, lifestyle, professionals | Resale competition | Actual secondary sales |
| Central Bandung house | Established demand, amenities | Price and congestion | Real peak-hour access |
| Gedebage property | New development, infrastructure | Flooding and subsidence | Exact parcel exposure |
| Southern basin property | Lower entry prices | Flooding and weaker exit | Flood history and resale demand |
| Lembang-area villa | Tourism, lifestyle | Slope and earthquake exposure | Structure, drainage and access |
| Whoosh-linked property | Jakarta connectivity | Paying too much for the story | Door-to-door journey time |
Are Bandung property prices rising fast enough to rescue a bad purchase?
No. Property prices are currently moving too slowly for Bandung buyers to assume that a weak purchase price will simply be fixed by market appreciation.
Bank Indonesia's latest residential survey showed primary-market prices across Indonesia rising only 0.69% year on year in the second quarter, after 0.62% in the previous quarter. Primary residential sales also remained 2.36% below the previous year's level, although that was far better than the 25.67% contraction recorded one quarter earlier.
Those are national figures rather than a clean Bandung resale index, so we would not use 0.69% as a Bandung appreciation forecast. They still tell us something useful about the market around Bandung: Indonesia currently has fairly weak nominal house-price inflation rather than a broad property boom capable of covering mistakes quickly.
Imagine paying Rp1.1 billion for a property that comparable buyers would realistically value at Rp1 billion. Even 3% annual appreciation would take more than three years just to close that initial 10% valuation gap before considering tax, financing, renovation or selling costs.
This makes the entry price one of the biggest risks in Bandung today. We would much rather own an unexciting property bought close to its real secondary-market value than a fashionable development priced as though several years of future growth had already happened.
Don't buy the wrong property, in the wrong area of the Philippines
Buying real estate is a significant investment. Don't rely solely on your intuition. Gather the right information to make the best decision.
Can foreigners actually buy property safely in Bandung?
Yes, foreigners can legally own certain homes in Bandung, but using the wrong ownership structure can turn an ordinary property purchase into the biggest risk in the entire deal.
Indonesia's current framework comes mainly from Government Regulation No. 18 of 2021 and its implementing land rules. Foreigners with the required immigration documents can own qualifying residential property, including landed homes based on Hak Pakai and qualifying apartment units. Hak Milik, the country's strongest form of freehold land ownership, remains fundamentally reserved for Indonesian citizens.
That distinction needs to be understood before negotiating a price. A marketing description such as “freehold,” “foreigner friendly” or “99-year ownership” tells us very little until we see the registered land right and the legal mechanism through which the foreign buyer will hold the property.
Nominee arrangements deserve particular caution. Putting Hak Milik land in an Indonesian person's name while relying on side agreements does not turn the foreign buyer into the registered owner. Death, divorce, debts, inheritance disputes or a simple breakdown in the relationship can expose how little control the foreign buyer really has.
The regulation is clearer than many sales pitches. Government Regulation No. 18 explicitly says eligible foreigners may own residential property and specifies the land-right structures that can be used. We would build the deal around those rules rather than trying to contract around them.
| Structure | What a foreign buyer really gets | Main risk | Our view |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hak Milik land | Foreign individual cannot simply hold it directly | Nominee/control risk | Avoid workarounds |
| Hak Pakai landed home | Recognized property right if conditions are met | Eligibility and title structure | Potentially sound |
| Qualifying apartment | Recognized ownership route if structure qualifies | Underlying land and documentation | Potentially sound |
| Long lease | Contractual right to occupy/use | Counterparty and renewal risk | Can work |
| Nominee arrangement | Another person remains registered owner | Enforcement and loss of control | Very high risk |
Can a Bandung property have a certificate and still be legally messy?
Absolutely. A Bandung property certificate is only the start of legal due diligence because the seller, land boundaries, mortgages, permits and actual building all need to match the paperwork.
For landed property, we would have the certificate independently checked through a competent PPAT/notary and the relevant land records. Ownership, Hak Tanggungan or other encumbrances, inheritance rights, disputes, parcel boundaries and the seller's authority all need to line up before money changes hands.
Older Bandung homes deserve extra attention because buildings are often extended or altered over time. A house may look excellent after renovation while parts of the structure, commercial use or additional floors do not cleanly match its approvals.
Apartments bring another set of questions. We need to know the status of the strata title, the legal right underneath the building, the remaining term where the underlying right is time-limited and whether the developer has completed the documentation required for individual owners.
This becomes especially important during resale. A legal problem that the first buyer tolerated can stop the next buyer's bank, notary or lawyer immediately. The discount then arrives when we need to sell rather than when we had the chance to negotiate the purchase.
Get to know the market before buying a property in the Philippines
Better information leads to better decisions. Get all the data you need before investing a large amount of money.
Are cheap Bandung apartments actually bargains?
Some are, but a cheap Bandung apartment can stay cheap for years when the building contains hundreds of almost interchangeable units.
The attraction is easy to understand. Bandung has a sizeable apartment market, relatively low ticket prices in older developments and strong pools of students, young workers and temporary residents. Small units can also produce much better rent-to-price ratios than expensive landed homes.
Resale competition is where the numbers can become unpleasant. If twenty similar studios in the same tower are listed around Rp300 million, our unit has almost no pricing power. One owner accepting Rp270 million because they need cash can reset what buyers expect to pay throughout the building.
Developer pricing can make the comparison even harder. New units may be advertised using installment plans, furnishing packages, discounts and inflated reference prices that have little connection with what existing owners can achieve in the secondary market. We care much more about completed resales than the number printed on a showroom brochure.
Building condition also belongs in this calculation. Broken elevators, water problems, poorly maintained corridors, weak service-charge collection or a depleted sinking fund can slowly turn an apparently cheap unit into an even cheaper one. Those problems hurt rent and resale at the same time.
When we assess a Bandung apartment, we would count competing listings in the exact building, compare asking prices across several months, ask agents about completed transactions and inspect the common areas as carefully as the apartment itself.
Are Bandung rental yields really as attractive as property listings suggest?
Sometimes, but the best-looking Bandung rental yields shrink quickly once we use realistic occupancy, expenses and the right local competition.
Small apartments and boarding-style accommodation can produce attractive gross yields because the purchase price per unit is relatively low. Current market estimates sometimes put selected small Bandung apartments in the high-single-digit gross range. That can be genuinely interesting, provided the rent is real and repeatable.
A gross yield leaves out the expensive parts. Apartment service charges, repairs, furniture, tenant turnover, agent fees, vacancy and management all come from the same rent. A Rp300 million studio earning Rp2.25 million per month appears to yield 9% gross at full occupancy. Lose one month to vacancy, spend Rp3 million on annual repairs and furniture, pay Rp500,000 per occupied month in building and management costs, and the economics look very different.
Student demand also needs to be treated carefully. Bandung has ITB, UPI, Telkom University, Universitas Padjadjaran in Greater Bandung and a large group of private institutions, which gives the city one of Indonesia's deepest education-driven rental markets. Yet apartments compete directly with kost rooms, shared houses and purpose-built student accommodation.
A student who can rent a practical kost near campus has little reason to pay a huge premium because an apartment investor bought a swimming pool and a high-floor view. The purchase premium and the rental premium can be completely different.
For that reason, we would underwrite Bandung rental property against what tenants can rent nearby today, then assume some vacancy. A deal that only produces its advertised yield when all twelve months are occupied is already too fragile.
| Example on a Rp300m unit | Amount | What the headline calculation shows | What a realistic calculation changes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly rent | Rp2.25m | Rp27m annual rent | Depends on occupancy |
| Gross yield at 12 months | 9.0% | Looks excellent | Before any costs |
| One vacant month | -Rp2.25m | Usually ignored | Rent falls immediately |
| Repairs/furnishing allowance | -Rp3m | Usually ignored | Recurring ownership cost |
| Charges/management example | -Rp5.5m | Usually ignored | Can be substantial |
| Cash income after these examples | Rp16.25m | — | About 5.4% before tax/finance |
Buying real estate in the Philippines can be risky
An increasing number of foreign investors are showing interest. However, 90% of them will make mistakes. Avoid the pitfalls with our comprehensive guide.
Does Bandung tourism make Airbnb property an easy investment?
No. Bandung currently gets huge numbers of visitors, but recent hotel data show exactly why turning those visitors into reliable Airbnb income is harder than it sounds.
The latest Bandung City data from BPS recorded just over 2.03 million domestic tourist trips in June. Hotel occupancy was 54.58%. One month earlier, Bandung had recorded about 2.27 million domestic trips and 53.41% hotel occupancy.
Those are big visitor numbers, yet they leave a lot of accommodation empty. The contrast becomes clearer when we look back only a few months: hotel occupancy was 41.48% in March. Bandung can have more than two million domestic trips in a month without anything close to full accommodation occupancy.
Guests also stay briefly. BPS reported an average stay of 1.47 nights in star-rated hotels and only 1.17 nights in non-star hotels in May. Short stays mean more cleaning, more check-ins, more platform management and more opportunities for empty nights between bookings.
A Bandung short-term rental needs a reason to win against hotels, guesthouses and thousands of other furnished rooms. Walkability, proximity to a major destination, parking, design, a good view or professional management can create that advantage. “Bandung gets lots of tourists” cannot.
| Recent Bandung tourism measure | Level | What it tells us |
|---|---|---|
| Domestic trips in March | ~2.07m | Visitor volume remained large |
| Hotel occupancy in March | 41.48% | Large tourism volume can coexist with weak occupancy |
| Domestic trips in May | ~2.27m | Demand recovered strongly |
| Hotel occupancy in May | 53.41% | Improvement, but far from full |
| Domestic trips in June | ~2.03m | Tourism remained deep |
| Hotel occupancy in June | 54.58% | Accommodation still had substantial spare capacity |
| Star-hotel average stay in May | 1.47 nights | Turnover is very high |
Is flooding still a serious property risk in Bandung?
Yes. Flooding remains one of the easiest ways to buy the wrong Bandung property because exposure can change dramatically within the same part of the city.
The risk has enough persistence that Bandung's city government placed the city under emergency-preparedness status for flooding, flash floods, extreme weather and landslides earlier this year. That is more useful for buyers than treating flooding as an exceptional event from the distant past.
The wider southern Bandung Basin has recurring problems as well. Flood events have recently affected hundreds of homes around Dayeuhkolot, Baleendah and Bojongsoang, sometimes cutting road access even where individual houses remained usable.
That last point is easy to miss. We care about the road, parking entrance and immediate neighborhood as much as whether water entered the living room. A dry apartment is still awkward to rent or sell if the basement floods or tenants cannot reach it after heavy rain.
Before buying, we would speak to people who actually live on the street, ask what happened during several recent heavy-rain events and check the property's elevation relative to the road and nearby drainage. “The owner says it never floods” is not enough evidence.
Don't lose money on your property in the Philippines
100% of people who have lost money there have spent less than 1 hour researching the market. We have reviewed everything there is to know. Grab our guide now.
Is land subsidence now a real concern for Bandung property buyers?
Yes, especially in parts of the Bandung Basin where newer housing is being built on ground that satellite data show is still moving.
A recently published study tracked deformation across the Bandung Metropolitan Area from 2018 through 2024 using Sentinel-1 satellite data. It found major subsidence above 10 centimetres per year concentrated in some urbanizing zones built over compressible deposits. The study specifically detected deformation in Margaasih, Babakan Ciparay, Bojongloa Kidul, Bojongsoang, Rancasari, Buahbatu and Gedebage.
The more worrying detail is the trajectory. Researchers found that subsidence funnels had become visible across much of the metropolitan area by 2021 and that deformation intensified in several places afterward. Some observation points in newly developing areas experienced cumulative movement beyond 50 centimetres during the study period.
That does not mean every house in Gedebage is dropping 10 centimetres each year. Subsidence varies sharply over short distances, and a metropolitan research map cannot replace a site-specific engineering assessment.
Still, the evidence is too strong to dismiss as an old Bandung story caused only by historical groundwater extraction. The newest study connects ongoing deformation with a combination of geology, groundwater conditions, construction loads and rapid urban development.
For a large purchase in an exposed part of the basin, we would want to know how the foundations were designed, whether nearby roads or buildings show differential settlement, how groundwater is supplied and whether the developer has carried out proper geotechnical investigation.
| Recent subsidence evidence | What researchers found | What a buyer should take from it |
|---|---|---|
| Satellite monitoring | Deformation continued through 2024 | Risk is still current |
| Some urbanizing zones | More than 10 cm/year | Location matters enormously |
| Selected monitoring points | More than 50 cm cumulative movement | Long-term movement can be material |
| Gedebage, Bojongsoang, Buahbatu | Deformation detected | New construction does not remove geological risk |
| Northern outer basin | Some areas showed uplift/stability | Bandung does not share one subsidence profile |
How worried should Bandung buyers be about the Lembang Fault?
Bandung's earthquake risk is serious enough to change which building we buy, although it is far too unpredictable to use as a reason to avoid the whole market.
The Lembang Fault runs north of Bandung and is an active fault system roughly 29 kilometres long. A detailed geodetic study using six years of radar and GNSS measurements estimated movement of around 4.7 millimetres per year and calculated accumulated seismic potential compatible with roughly magnitude 6.6 to 7.0 events under its modeled scenarios.
No one can turn that into a useful prediction of when a major earthquake will happen. The property decision we can actually control is structural vulnerability.
For an older Bandung house, we would pay attention to unreinforced masonry, poorly executed extensions, large unsupported openings and changes made without structural engineering. For hillside property farther north, earthquake shaking can combine with retaining-wall and slope problems. In an apartment, construction quality and management of the building become far more important than which floor has the best view.
Earthquake risk has low frequency but potentially very high severity. We would give it less weight than a flood that hits the access road regularly, yet much more weight than buyers usually give it when inspecting a beautiful older villa.
Get the full checklist for your due diligence in the Philippines
Don't repeat the same mistakes others have made before you. Make sure everything is in order before signing your sales contract.
Can Bandung traffic ruin a good property location?
Yes. Bandung's congestion is bad enough today that a short distance on a map can hide a miserable daily commute.
TomTom's latest full-year traffic data measured Bandung's congestion level at 64.1%, up slightly from the previous year and the highest among the Indonesian cities in its ranking. A 10-kilometre trip averaged around 32 minutes. During evening rush hour, the same distance took about 40 minutes, with average speeds around 14.9 km/h.
That changes what “central” means. A property five kilometres from ITB, an office district or a major shopping area can still be inconvenient if every journey funnels through the wrong intersections. Conversely, a slightly more distant property with straightforward access can work better in daily life.
Weekend traffic deserves attention too, particularly toward northern Bandung and Lembang. A location that works perfectly on a quiet weekday morning may feel completely different when tourism traffic builds.
We would test the actual journey before buying. Drive or ride from the property to the main destination during morning rush hour, evening rush hour and a busy weekend. That gives us better information than any “15 minutes from Dago” line in a listing.
Will Whoosh and Bandung's new growth areas automatically make nearby property more valuable?
No. Whoosh has genuinely improved Greater Bandung's connection with Jakarta, but buyers can still lose money by paying too much for a property that is merely marketed as “near” the high-speed rail.
The transport improvement itself is real. Padalarang connects Whoosh passengers onward toward central Bandung by feeder train, while the eastern station around Tegalluar/Summarecon is tied into roads, shuttles and the emerging eastern development corridor. Ridership has grown well beyond the railway's early operating levels.
The difficult part is translating that into property value. Greater Bandung is huge, and a fast Jakarta-to-Bandung rail journey can be followed by a slow local trip through Bandung traffic. Five kilometres of awkward last-mile travel may matter more to a resident than another ten kilometres travelled quickly by train.
The eastern development story also overlaps with physical risks we have already found. Gedebage and nearby growth areas have major projects, newer housing and improving infrastructure, while parts of the same wider zone appear in flood and subsidence research. Buyers need to price both sides of that story.
We would pay readily for a transport link that already saves residents time. We would be much more conservative when the premium depends on future roads, future commercial centers, future feeder services and future appreciation all arriving together.
Don't sign a document you don't understand in the Philippines
Buying a property over there? We have reviewed all the documents you need to know. Stay out of trouble - grab our comprehensive guide.
Is buying off-plan property in Bandung worth the extra risk?
Only when the price gives us a real reason to accept the extra risk, and many Bandung off-plan deals do not offer enough of a discount.
An off-plan buyer takes several risks at once. Construction can run late. Specifications can change. Financing conditions can move. New competing units can enter the market. The developer can still be selling fresh inventory when the first owners try to resell.
The legal checks also need to happen before construction is finished, when buyers have the least physical evidence to inspect. We would verify the developer's control over the land, project permits, underlying title, construction progress, payment structure, handover commitments and the path toward the final ownership documents.
The price difference should compensate us for all of that. Suppose a completed comparable apartment can actually be bought from an existing owner for Rp1 billion. Paying Rp970 million off-plan because the developer claims the eventual list price will be Rp1.2 billion gives us only a 3% discount against the asset we could own today. That is a poor trade for several years of construction and market risk.
Completed projects from developers with a strong delivery record deserve more confidence. Even then, we would compare the off-plan price against real resale transactions rather than the developer's own price ladder.
| Off-plan question | Weak answer | Better answer |
|---|---|---|
| Who owns/controls the land? | Sales team says it is secured | Independently verified |
| How far has construction gone? | Renderings and showroom | Visible funded progress |
| What happens after delays? | Vague contractual wording | Defined timetable and remedies |
| How is the price justified? | Discount from developer list price | Discount from completed resale |
| Who will buy from us later? | Mostly investors in the same project | Clear end-user demand |
| Developer history | Little comparable delivery | Several completed projects |
If we suddenly need to sell a Bandung property, how hard can it be?
Quite hard. Resale liquidity is one of Bandung's biggest financial risks because many properties have a much smaller real buyer pool than their listing prices suggest.
This is especially obvious with apartments. A buyer comparing twenty similar studios in one building has no emotional reason to pick ours. The owner willing to accept the lowest price often determines what a quick sale is worth.
Large houses create a different liquidity problem. Bandung has plenty of households, but the number able and willing to buy a Rp5 billion, Rp10 billion or Rp20 billion house is much smaller. Highly customized villas, complicated titles and distant holiday properties narrow the pool even more.
Financing matters as well. A clean, conventional house that banks readily accept can attract financed local buyers. Properties with unusual legal structures or documentation problems may quietly turn into cash-buyer-only assets, even if agents keep advertising them at a high nominal value.
The number we care about is the 60-day selling price, not the optimistic portal price. Before buying, we would ask several local agents what price would produce an actual buyer within one or two months. We would then compare that number with the seller's asking price.
A large gap tells us the property already contains an exit cost before we even own it.
Get fresh and reliable information about the market in the Philippines
Don't base significant investment decisions on outdated data. Get updated and accurate information.
So what are the biggest risks when buying property in Bandung today?
The biggest Bandung property risks today are legal mistakes, flood and subsidence exposure, poor resale liquidity, overpaying for future development and rental returns that look much better on paper than they perform in real life.
Bandung still has plenty going for it. The city has deep local housing demand, major universities, more than two million domestic tourist trips in some recent months, stronger Jakarta connectivity and large new development zones. None of those demand engines is weak enough for us to dismiss the market.
What makes Bandung tricky is how easily several risks can accumulate in one property. Consider a new apartment in an eastern growth area bought off-plan at a developer premium. The buyer may simultaneously be betting on future infrastructure, future neighborhood development, strong rental occupancy and easy resale while also taking building, flood or subsidence risk. One disappointing project can then undermine several parts of the investment thesis at once.
A much safer Bandung purchase has boring qualities: a legal structure we fully understand, documentation independently checked, proven access during heavy rain, no obvious local ground problem, realistic peak-hour travel times, rent supported by nearby occupied units and an entry price close to what comparable properties already sell for.
We would currently rank legal ownership and title problems first because a bad structure can threaten the asset itself. Flood and subsidence come next in exposed locations because they cannot be renovated away easily. Resale liquidity is the major financial risk, particularly for generic apartments and unusual high-end homes. Infrastructure hype, weak rental underwriting and off-plan execution sit just behind them.
Bandung can still be a good place to buy property. The buyers most likely to regret it are those who buy the Bandung story before investigating the individual address.
| Bandung property risk | Severity | How local is it? | How much can good due diligence reduce it? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wrong ownership/title structure | Very high | Property-specific | A lot |
| Flood exposure | High | Extremely local | A lot before purchase |
| Land subsidence | High in exposed areas | Extremely local | Partly |
| Weak resale liquidity | High | Property/type-specific | A lot through entry price |
| Paying for future infrastructure | High | Project-specific | A lot |
| Rental underperformance | Medium-high | Micro-location specific | A lot |
| Off-plan/developer risk | Medium-high | Project-specific | A lot |
| Congestion | Medium-high | Street-specific | Mainly through location choice |
| Earthquake vulnerability | Medium-high, low-frequency | Building-specific and regional | Partly through construction quality |
| Tourism seasonality | Medium | Rental-segment specific | A lot through conservative underwriting |
OUR METHODOLOGY
This analysis asks what the biggest risks are when buying property in Bandung today. We broke the question into the areas that can independently make a purchase go wrong: ownership and title, physical exposure, pricing and resale, rental economics, tourism, mobility and infrastructure, and development or execution risk.
We prioritized recent official rules, public records, market and tourism data, disaster reporting, transport evidence and first-hand geospatial or seismic research. Broad national indicators were used as context, while the practical conclusions were pushed down to the property, building, street or parcel level wherever the evidence allowed it.
We did not treat any single headline figure as decisive. Tourism volumes were read alongside hotel occupancy and length of stay; infrastructure improvements were considered together with last-mile access; and citywide property conditions were separated from building-level resale competition, title structure and local physical exposure.
We also avoided forcing unlike risks into a single numerical score. Instead, we ranked them by the severity of the downside, how specific they are to the individual property, how difficult they would be to reverse after purchase, and how much careful due diligence can reduce them beforehand.
Key legal sources include Government Regulation No. 18 of 2021, the ATR/BPN English translation of Government Regulation No. 18 of 2021, ATR/BPN Regulation No. 18 of 2021, the Basic Agrarian Law, and Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 on Land Registration.
For the current property-market backdrop, we used Bank Indonesia's Residential Property Price Survey for Q2 2026. It provides the national primary-market price and sales context, but we do not treat that national series as a Bandung-specific appreciation index.
Tourism and accommodation conditions are based on Bandung City BPS releases for March 2026, May 2026, and June 2026. We used visitor volumes, occupancy and average stay together because any one of them on its own gives an incomplete picture of short-term-rental demand.
Flood exposure is grounded in Bandung City's 2026 emergency-preparedness decision and recent BNPB reporting on flooding in April 2026 and May 2026. These sources are used to establish recurrence and affected areas, not to replace property-level flood checks.
Subsidence is based on a 2026 peer-reviewed Bandung Metropolitan Area study using Sentinel-1 data from 2018 to 2024. Earthquake risk is based on the Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences study of the Lembang Fault using InSAR and GNSS data. Both are treated as regional or zone-level evidence that still requires site and building-specific engineering judgment.
For mobility and infrastructure, we used the TomTom Traffic Index for Bandung and the West Java Provincial Government's confirmation of the Whoosh feeder connection. The final ranking brings these legal, physical, market and operating findings together, giving the greatest weight to risks that can threaten ownership, permanently impair a location or materially restrict resale.
Get to know the market before buying a property in the Philippines
Better information leads to better decisions. Get all the data you need before investing a large amount of money.
Related blog posts
- Is Airbnb still worth it in Philippines now?
- How much are property taxes and buying fees in Philippines?
- Are rents in Philippines still rising?
- Is Davao City a good place to live as an expat?
