Is Airbnb still worth it in Johor now?

Get all the data you need about the real estate market in Johor

Thinking of buying real estate in Johor?

Acquiring property in a different country is a complex task. Don't fall into common traps – grab our guide and make better decisions.

Download Now

Why is Airbnb profitability in Fukuoka harder to judge now?

Airbnb in Fukuoka can still make good money today, but the gap between a successful listing and a good property investment has become much wider.

Tourism is not the problem. Fukuoka is filling hotel rooms, attracting more overseas visitors and keeping short-term rentals busy in its strongest neighborhoods. Yet investors entering now are paying considerably more for property than owners who bought a few years ago, and Japan's rules sharply restrict what many ordinary residential Airbnbs can earn.

That creates two very different versions of the Fukuoka Airbnb market. A residential minpaku operates under Japan's annual night limit. A property licensed under the Inns and Hotels Act can run throughout the year. Looking at an average Airbnb revenue figure without knowing which type of property produced it can lead to a completely unrealistic investment model.

There is another complication. The latest AirDNA figures show huge year-on-year increases in average annual revenue in central Fukuoka, but RevPAR has risen much more slowly. Revenue per available night is up 4.7% in Hakata and just 1.6% in Chuo. That is a much calmer picture than headline annual-revenue growth of 35% and 48%.

So claims that Airbnb profitability in Fukuoka is suddenly booming deserve some skepticism. The market is strong, but buying into that strength at today's prices is a different question.

Is tourism in Fukuoka still strong enough for Airbnb?

Tourism demand in Fukuoka is currently strong enough to support Airbnb, and weak visitor numbers are one of the risks we can largely rule out for now.

The Fukuoka Convention & Visitors Bureau's latest available spring data showed 1.55 million guest-nights in the city in April, while hotel occupancy reached 83.7%. Foreign arrivals through Fukuoka Airport and Hakata Port reached 373,911 that month, 10.3% more than a year earlier and a record for the city's monthly series.

The preceding months tell the same broader story. Hotel occupancy reached 83.7% in February and 78.6% in March. Foreign arrivals were up 19.5% year on year in February and 10.3% in March. Foreign guest-nights jumped 27.9% in February.

Domestic tourism has been softer. Total guest-nights fell slightly year on year in several recent months, including a 3.8% decline in April, largely because Japanese guest-nights were down 5.8%. We would not describe Fukuoka tourism as exploding across every measure.

But the market does not need explosive growth to support short-term rentals. Hotels repeatedly running around 80% occupancy, record foreign arrivals and continued growth in international traffic are already a strong demand base.

Don't buy the wrong property, in the wrong area of Johor

Buying real estate is a significant investment. Don't rely solely on your intuition. Gather the right information to make the best decision.

Get the data

Are Fukuoka Airbnb occupancy numbers misleading?

Fukuoka Airbnb occupancy is genuinely strong in the best areas, but a 70% occupancy rate does not mean a normal residential Airbnb is occupied for 70% of the entire year.

The distinction comes from how short-term-rental analytics calculate occupancy. AirDNA divides booked nights by nights that a property was actually available. If a host makes a unit available for only part of the year, closed nights do not automatically drag down the occupancy rate.

That becomes unusually important in Japan because a residential minpaku can host guests for no more than 180 nights in its annual regulatory period. A property offered for 170 nights and booked for 120 would show roughly 71% occupancy even though guests stayed there on only about one-third of all calendar nights.

Different data providers also produce very different Fukuoka estimates. AirDNA's latest completed-market data put Hakata at 70% occupancy and Chuo at 69%. Airbtics has produced a much higher citywide estimate around 82%, while AirROI has reported a figure closer to 50%.

Those gaps are too large to treat any single citywide occupancy number as an investment assumption. We put more weight on ward-level data, availability and the exact licence of the property.

Is Airbnb competition getting worse in Fukuoka?

Airbnb competition is getting tougher in parts of Fukuoka, but central operators are still holding up much better than hosts in weaker outer districts.

Citywide datasets have shown a substantial expansion of short-term rentals over recent years. Yet the freshest ward-level picture is more complicated.

AirDNA's latest market overview counts 1,149 active properties in Hakata over its trailing measurement period, down 6.7% year on year. Chuo has 677, down 14%. Both wards simultaneously recorded higher occupancy.

Recent supply snapshots can move sharply as AirDNA changes the period and active-listing definition, so Fukuoka does not have one perfectly stable inventory count. Revenue efficiency is more useful here.

Hakata's RevPAR is currently $94, up 4.7%. Chuo stands at $97, up only 1.6%. In Nishi-ku, by comparison, RevPAR has fallen 8.6%, while Minami-ku is down 9.4%. Those declines came alongside increasing supply in both outer wards.

Competition is already biting in parts of the city. Central Fukuoka still has enough demand to absorb a large short-term-rental base; some cheaper districts do not.

Get to know the market before buying a property in Johor

Better information leads to better decisions. Get all the data you need before investing a large amount of money.

Get the data

Is Hakata still the safest area for Airbnb in Fukuoka?

Hakata is still one of the safest Airbnb locations in Fukuoka today because it combines strong demand, high occupancy and a much better entry price than some premium parts of Chuo.

According to AirDNA's latest data through August, Hakata short-term rentals average 70% occupancy, a $134 ADR and $94 RevPAR. Occupancy is up 5% year on year while ADR has slipped 2.8%.

Hosts are filling more available nights without relying on large nightly-price increases.

Hakata also benefits from a type of demand that is difficult to reproduce in peripheral Fukuoka. Hakata Station is the city's main rail hub, connecting the Shinkansen, local JR services, subway lines and airport access. The ward also captures tourists using Fukuoka as a base for Kyushu rather than visiting only the city itself.

Property prices are rising quickly, however. The latest first-quarter transaction data compiled from Japan's Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism put the median Hakata condominium at around ¥18 million and ¥486,000 per square metre. The square-metre median was 17.6% higher than a year earlier.

Hakata therefore still gives us one of the cleaner Fukuoka Airbnb cases, especially for units near major transport. The catch is simple: a strong location still cannot rescue a bad purchase price.

Is Chuo-ku worth paying more for than Hakata?

Chuo-ku can earn more per Airbnb night than Hakata, but today's revenue premium is generally much smaller than the premium investors pay for the property.

Current AirDNA figures put Chuo at a $141 ADR versus $134 in Hakata. RevPAR is $97 versus $94, while average annual revenue is about $32,900 compared with $31,300.

So Chuo earns roughly 5% more annual short-term-rental revenue in those market averages.

The real-estate gap is much wider. First-quarter transaction data derived from the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism put Chuo condominiums at an average ¥656,889 per square metre, 9.2% more than a year earlier. Hakata's latest median is around ¥486,000 per square metre.

The comparison is not perfectly like-for-like because one dataset uses an average and the other a median, but the order of magnitude is clear. Chuo property can cost roughly one-third more per square metre while the average short-term rental earns only around 5% more.

There are also huge differences inside Chuo itself. A small older unit, a family apartment near Tenjin and a premium property around Ohori Park cannot sensibly share the same yield assumption.

For an investor focused on cash return rather than prestige or long-term appreciation, Hakata often gives us the better starting point.

Buying real estate in Johor can be risky

An increasing number of foreign investors are showing interest. However, 90% of them will make mistakes. Avoid the pitfalls with our comprehensive guide.

Download Now

Does Japan's 180-day minpaku limit kill Airbnb returns in Fukuoka?

Japan's 180-day minpaku limit does not kill Airbnb profitability in Fukuoka, but it makes many headline revenue estimates impossible for an ordinary residential minpaku to reproduce.

Under the Private Lodging Business Act, a registered residential lodging can accept guests for a maximum of 180 nights during the regulatory year.

Now apply that rule to the roughly ¥14,600 Fukuoka ADR reported by Airbtics. If 70% of the permitted nights are booked, room revenue comes to roughly ¥1.84 million. At 80%, it reaches about ¥2.10 million. Even filling every permitted night produces only around ¥2.63 million before operating expenses.

A citywide short-term-rental dataset showing ¥4 million or ¥4.5 million of annual revenue therefore cannot simply be copied into a residential-minpaku investment model.

Some properties in those datasets have different licences. Some have more extensive availability. Cleaning and other guest fees can also be included in reported revenue. Large apartments that accommodate groups can command much higher booking totals than a basic studio.

The licence belongs near the top of the spreadsheet, not in a legal footnote added later.

Can a Fukuoka apartment legally run on Airbnb all year?

A Fukuoka apartment can run as short-term accommodation throughout the year only when the property and operation qualify for the appropriate lodging licence; buying a condo and creating an Airbnb listing is nowhere near enough.

Fukuoka City currently recognizes two main routes relevant here. A residential lodging can be notified under the Private Lodging Business Act, while an accommodation business can apply for permission under the Inns and Hotels Act.

The second route removes the residential minpaku's annual operating ceiling, but the building has to qualify.

Fire compliance is one of the biggest filters. Fukuoka City warns prospective operators that changing a normal residence into accommodation can trigger requirements for alarms, evacuation arrangements and other fire-safety equipment. Serious fire-code violations can lead to administrative action and public disclosure.

The condominium itself can also stop the project. Japan's official minpaku guidance requires operators in condominium buildings to show that the management rules allow the business or, where the rules are silent, provide evidence that the owners' association does not intend to prohibit it.

There are further housing requirements under the residential system, including a kitchen, bathroom, toilet and washing facilities. Owner-absent properties also trigger management obligations under national law.

A property that already has a clear licensing path is consequently worth much more to an Airbnb investor than a visually similar apartment where permission is uncertain. We would resolve this before agreeing on the purchase, not afterwards.

Don't lose money on your property in Johor

100% of people who have lost money there have spent less than 1 hour researching the market. We have reviewed everything there is to know. Grab our guide now.

Download Now

How much of Fukuoka Airbnb revenue disappears in operating costs?

Operating costs can easily take a large bite out of Fukuoka Airbnb revenue, especially for a foreign or absentee owner who needs somebody else to run the property.

Fukuoka management companies commonly advertise full-service management around 20% of sales. At ¥3 million of gross booking revenue, that alone is roughly ¥600,000.

Airbnb then charges platform fees. The exact structure depends on the host and setup, with traditional split-fee hosts often paying around 3% while the host-only structure used by many professional operators is considerably higher.

Cleaning should also be treated carefully. A cleaning fee collected from the guest increases booking revenue, but most of it may simply pay the cleaner, laundry and turnover costs. A property receiving ten two-night bookings needs five times as many turnovers as one receiving two ten-night bookings for the same 20 occupied nights.

Utilities also sit with the short-term-rental operator. So do internet, consumables, linen replacement, damaged furniture and the extra wear that comes with frequent guest changes.

Fukuoka's accommodation tax adds administration rather than a major direct hit to owner profit. Guests generally pay ¥200 per person per night below the relevant ¥20,000 price threshold and ¥500 above it, with the operator responsible for collection and reporting.

Once all of those costs are included, a ¥3 million Airbnb is clearly not a ¥3 million income stream. Plenty of attractive gross-yield calculations die right there.

Are Fukuoka property prices now rising faster than Airbnb income?

Property prices in Fukuoka are rising fast enough that new Airbnb investors should worry more about the purchase price today than existing hosts did a few years ago.

The latest official Fukuoka City land survey showed residential land prices rising 7.2% year on year and commercial land 10.2%. These are citywide averages across official reference sites, so they are better used to judge the direction of the market than to price an individual apartment.

Central condominium data point the same way. Chuo's latest first-quarter resale figure reached roughly ¥657,000 per square metre, up 9.2% year on year. Hakata's median square-metre transaction price reached around ¥486,000, up 17.6%.

Airbnb revenue appears to be rising much faster if we look only at AirDNA's annual revenue measure. Hakata is up about 35% and Chuo roughly 48%.

We should not read those percentages literally as the improvement in a typical existing property, though. Listing mix, availability and other composition effects affect the annual-revenue average. RevPAR provides a cleaner view of how much the market earns from each available night, and that measure has risen just 4.7% in Hakata and 1.6% in Chuo.

Property acquisition costs are therefore climbing much faster than short-term-rental revenue efficiency in the latest comparison.

An owner who bought five years ago can benefit from both stronger tourism and a lower historical purchase price. A buyer entering now has to make the deal work after much of Fukuoka's growth has already been reflected in the real estate.

Get the full checklist for your due diligence in Johor

Don't repeat the same mistakes others have made before you. Make sure everything is in order before signing your sales contract.

Download Now

Can a cheaper Airbnb outside central Fukuoka make more money?

A cheaper Airbnb outside central Fukuoka can produce a better percentage return, but current market data give us no reason to assume the suburbs are automatically the smarter buy.

AirDNA puts Nishi-ku at roughly 56% occupancy and a $101 ADR, while Minami-ku is around 57% and $90. Jonan-ku performs somewhat better at 62% occupancy and a $100 ADR.

Those figures sit well below central Fukuoka. As seen above, Hakata is around 70% occupancy and Chuo around 69%.

The direction has recently been weaker too. Nishi's RevPAR has fallen 8.6% year on year while active supply increased. Minami's RevPAR is down 9.4% alongside higher listing supply.

That does not make the outer wards bad investments. A sufficiently large discount on the purchase price can more than compensate for lower nightly income. A ¥15 million unit earning ¥1.8 million before costs can easily produce a better gross return than a ¥35 million apartment earning ¥3 million.

But the discount has to be real. Saving 20% on the property while sacrificing 35% of sustainable accommodation income would leave us worse off.

Can long-term rent beat Airbnb in Fukuoka?

Long-term renting can absolutely beat a Fukuoka Airbnb once we compare net income rather than headline booking revenue, particularly when the Airbnb is legally restricted and professionally managed.

Consider a residential short-term rental generating roughly ¥2.1 million of room revenue under the strong 80%-occupancy example calculated earlier. A manager charging 20% takes about ¥420,000 before we have paid platform fees, utilities, turnover costs, repairs or furnishings.

The owner may then find that the Airbnb premium over an ordinary lease is much smaller than expected.

Recent asking-rent histories for some larger Hakata apartments, for example, sit around ¥150,000-¥170,000 per month. That translates into approximately ¥1.8 million-¥2.0 million of annual rent before normal landlord costs, without guest messaging, furniture replacement, nightly pricing, accommodation-tax administration or frequent cleaning.

One building does not represent all of Hakata, and short-term rentals can outperform those numbers considerably. The comparison simply shows how close the two strategies can become once Airbnb costs are included.

The calculation changes dramatically for a properly licensed accommodation property that can sell far more nights. That type of unit has enough additional inventory to create a genuine revenue gap over conventional renting.

So when we compare Airbnb with long-term rent in Fukuoka, the first question should be which legal operating model we are actually comparing.

Don't sign a document you don't understand in Johor

Buying a property over there? We have reviewed all the documents you need to know. Stay out of trouble - grab our comprehensive guide.

Download Now

What kind of Airbnb property still works best in Fukuoka?

The Fukuoka Airbnb properties we like most today combine central transport access, several-person guest capacity, legal certainty and a purchase price that still leaves room for a decent yield.

Transport access comes first. Hakata works because guests can reach the airport, Shinkansen, subway and the rest of Kyushu easily. In Chuo, proximity to Tenjin and other major subway stops gives a similar advantage.

Guest capacity can be just as valuable as postcode prestige. Japan's residential-lodging rules require at least 3.3 square metres of guest-room floor area per guest, so layout affects how many people can legally stay.

A well-configured apartment for four or six guests can compete for families and groups that would otherwise need several hotel rooms. That gives the host a better reason to exist than simply offering another small room to a solo traveler.

Legal certainty can outweigh cosmetic quality. We would rather buy an older, well-located property with confirmed short-term-rental permission and a workable fire-safety setup than a beautiful new apartment where the condominium rules block the business.

Finally, the purchase price has to fit the revenue. These days, paying a huge premium for Ohori, Tenjin or another prestigious micro-location makes little sense if the extra ADR cannot cover the extra capital invested.

The best Fukuoka Airbnb deal is increasingly the slightly unglamorous one that works exceptionally well on paper and in practice.

Could Fukuoka Airbnb demand fall from here?

Fukuoka Airbnb demand could cool from today's strong level, but there is still no convincing evidence that the city has entered a tourism downturn.

Recent visitor numbers have been mixed enough to deserve some caution. Total guest-nights have posted modest year-on-year declines in several months, and domestic accommodation demand has been softer.

Foreign travel is doing much more of the heavy lifting. International arrivals continued growing by double digits in several recent months, and the latest available spring figure set a monthly record.

That leaves Fukuoka increasingly exposed to the forces driving inbound Japanese tourism: airline capacity, exchange rates, Asian consumer spending and Japan's overall appeal to foreign visitors.

Supply is another risk. A city can keep attracting more tourists while individual Airbnb returns fall if the number of rooms grows even faster. We can already see some pressure of that kind in Nishi and Minami.

For now, though, expensive acquisitions and weak property selection rank above a collapse in tourism demand on the list of things most likely to hurt a Fukuoka Airbnb investment.

Get fresh and reliable information about the market in Johor

Don't base significant investment decisions on outdated data. Get updated and accurate information.

Get the data

Is Airbnb still profitable in Fukuoka?

Yes. Airbnb is still profitable in Fukuoka today, but a new investor can no longer assume that strong tourism alone will produce a strong return.

Demand remains convincing. Hotels are regularly filling around four-fifths of their rooms, foreign arrivals have continued climbing, and central short-term rentals are booking a large share of their available nights.

The strongest case is still central Fukuoka. Hakata combines transport demand with relatively better acquisition economics, while Chuo commands higher nightly rates but usually asks investors to pay much more for the property. Outer wards can work when the purchase discount is large enough, although their recent RevPAR figures are less reassuring.

The legal setup can change the answer completely. A normal residential minpaku has a tightly limited pool of nights to sell. A fully licensed accommodation business can monetize the city's tourism demand throughout the year. Two apartments with identical Airbnb photos can therefore have completely different earning potential.

Costs narrow the gap further. Professional management around 20%, platform charges, cleaning, utilities, repairs and furnishing replacement can turn impressive gross revenue into a fairly ordinary net yield.

And property prices are no longer helping new buyers. Official Fukuoka residential land values have risen another 7.2%, while recent condominium prices in Hakata and Chuo have also moved sharply higher. Meanwhile, the latest improvement in central Airbnb RevPAR is only in the low single digits.

Hakata and Chuo are still around 70% occupancy of available nights, so this is not a weak Airbnb market. It is a market where the price paid for the property, its licence and its operating costs now decide whether the investment is actually good.

For an owner who bought cheaply several years ago, Fukuoka Airbnb can still be very profitable.

For a new buyer purchasing an ordinary residential apartment at today's central prices and outsourcing the whole operation, we would be much more selective. Long-term rent can sometimes produce a surprisingly similar net return with far less work.

A year-round licensed property near Hakata or another major transport hub remains the strongest setup. If the acquisition price is sensible, that version of the Fukuoka Airbnb business can still be genuinely attractive.

So the answer is yes, but the easy version of the trade has largely gone. In Fukuoka these days, Airbnb profitability comes from buying the right legal operation at the right price rather than simply buying into a popular tourist city.

Get to know the market before buying a property in Johor

Better information leads to better decisions. Get all the data you need before investing a large amount of money.

Get the data

Who is the author of this content?

BAMBOOROUTES

A team specialized in real estate investing in APAC countries (Japan, Thailand, Indonesia, Australia, etc.).

We are a team of financial experts, legal professionals, developers, and local real estate specialists dedicated to helping people like you avoid mistakes when investing in real estate in a foreign place, particularly in Johor. If you’d like to learn more about us, you can check our presentation page.